Free first conversation
The question, and whether research is the right instrument for it.
Copying articles into a monitoring report is reproduction, and in Belgium that needs authorisation from the rightsholders. Summary, reference and citation do not. We work inside that line and we tell clients where it falls before taking a brief.
Every brief is agreed in writing, and findings come back with the source and the date of each one.
Finding, checking and organising information on a defined question, with every source named.
See the programFollowing a subject across press and publications, delivered as summaries and references.
See the programWriting, rewriting and editing material in English, French and Dutch.
See the programProducing finished documents for publication, with third-party rights checked.
See the programA written brief, sources named in every delivery, copyright settled before a monitoring report is circulated, and the gaps reported rather than smoothed over.
The question, and whether research is the right instrument for it.
Scope, deadline, fee and what falls outside.
Sources logged, cross-checked where possible.
Findings with sources and dates, including what was not found.
Quoted per brief after a first conversation. Rightsholder licences, where needed, are the client's and are priced separately.
A single question, researched and delivered.
A subject followed over time, within copyright.
Said plainly, because the law reserves it.
Every engagement is quoted after a free consultation. No subscription.
TIMESAVER is a company incorporated under Belgian law, registered with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises under enterprise number 0455.989.971, based at 9 Quai a la Houille in 1000 Brussels and working since September 1995 under a single continuous management. The work is research, documentation, editorial production and publishing, in English, French and Dutch.
One rule shapes the monitoring work more than any other. Belgian and European copyright permits short quotation, citation and analysis; it does not permit systematic reproduction of press articles. A monitoring product that copies articles needs a licence from the rightsholders, and that licence belongs to the client, not to us. So we deliver summaries, references and citations unless a client holds one and shows it. Research, equally, is not advice: we establish what identified sources say on an identified date, and legal, tax and investment conclusions belong to the professions entitled to give them.
Not unless you hold a licence from the rightsholders. Reproducing press articles in a monitoring report is reproduction under copyright, not citation, and it requires authorisation from the collecting societies that represent the press in Belgium. We can deliver summaries, references and short citations, which the law permits, and we will work to your licence terms if you have one.
Because it changes how much weight a finding deserves. A report that only shows hits reads as more conclusive than the evidence allows. Telling you that three of six sources were silent, or that an archive was inaccessible, is what lets you judge whether to act on the rest.
We can tell you what the texts say and where they are published. What they mean for your situation is legal advice, which is reserved to the Bar in Belgium, and tax questions are reserved to professionals registered with the ITAA. We prepare the dossier so that consultation starts from something solid rather than from scratch.
It depends on how many sources have to be checked and how reachable they are, and we give a date once the brief is written rather than before. We would rather commit to a date we can hold than to the date you were hoping for.
Yes, in all three, which in Brussels is less a selling point than a practical necessity. Where a document will be published in more than one language we flag the passages that will not survive translation intact rather than discovering it at proof stage.
That is settled in the written brief before work starts, and it is the kind of thing that causes arguments precisely because nobody raised it. Third-party material inside a document stays with its rightsholder whatever the brief says, which is why we check and record those rights.
A free first conversation to scope it, with no obligation.